  
As in the past, the aim of this issue of Studio Works is to capture the essential character of the
design studio experience at the Graduate School of Design. In short, it provides both an overview and vignettes of a year
in the life of design students at Harvard, and an archive of their design speculations and deliberations.
Regardless of differences in format, all studios have a specific pedagogical focus, although no attempt
is made to comprehensively simulate office practice. Rather, all studios operate within a thematic
framework with specific educational, as distinct from strictly professional, objectives. To make an analogy with certain
ideas from other disciplines, the explicitly exploratory nature of design studios make them rather more
speculative than simply normal or routine in their focal interests. Here advantage is also taken of a strong
and broadly based program of visiting criticsanother hallmark of the studio experience at the Graduate
School of Design. The benefits include an added breath of perspective, different styles of studio instruction,
and a widened design outlook on the part of participants.
In addition to our annual review of studio work, this year we have decided to highlight independent
thesis projects. We have allotted more space than in the past to each student's work, thus providing a fuller sense of
the impressive reach of these explorations. In her editorial statement, student editor Rana Choi traces
the history of the thesis requirement at the GSD and asserts the value of this challenging exercise for
students today. As she notes, thesis offers students the chance to set the terms of their inquirya
rare opportunity in both academic and professional life. The individualized attention of a faculty
advisor further enriches a process that takes lessons learned in studio to a striking new level.
Peter G. Rowe
Dean Faculty of Design
CONTENTS
Dean's Prologue
Introduction to Departments
Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Design
Editorial Statement
CORE STUDIOS
STUDIO OPTIONS FALL 2000
OTHERWISE-NESS Alejandro Aravena
S.L.A.G. Julie Bargmann
Site Seeing Frank Barkow / Regine Leibinger
Lisbon Studio Goncalo Byrne
Phonics Institute: An Institute for the study of Communication with Light James Carpenter
Learning from Practice Ignacio Dahl Rocha
Berlin Studio Barbard Hoidn
Some Assembly Required: Somerville's Assembly Square Dorothée Imbert / Jacqueline Osty
Five Senses Rick Joy
Tectonic Apparatus Sandro Marpillero
Killing Time Juergen Mayer Hermann
Hangzhou, China Richard B. Peiser / Carl F. Steinitz
Building as Site / Performing the Kitchen Linda Pollak
Wenzhou, Shan-Shui City Peter G. Rowe / Rossana Vaccarino
Master Plan for Cooper Union Martha Schwartz / Christopher Janney
STUDIO OPTIONS SPRING 2001
Shore Park and Canal Park, Malmö, Sweden Thorbj&oulm;rn Anderson
The Generating Matrix Cecil Balmond
Cuba Leland Cott
Architecture as a Landscape: New Urban Spaces Elizabeth Gali / Manuel Ruisanchez
Genoa: Making the Space of the City Adriaan Geuze / Richard Marshall
The Littoral, Caracas, Venezuela Ken Greenberg
Multipurpose Cultural Building and Plaza in Barcelona, Spain Jacques Herzog / Pierre de Meuron
Skyway /Subway Cities: Alternative Pedestrian Systems and the New Multilevel City Vincent James
Brownfields in PittsburghA Vision of the Future Peter Lanz
Atlanta Studio M. David Lee / Wellington Reiter
Three Cultural Houses for Trinity College Andrea Leers
An Academic DistrictPamplona, Spain Rodolfo Machado
Mangado Studio Francisco Mangado
Three New Skycrapers in Boston or High-Rise Buildings on the Boston Skyline José Rafael Moneo / Gary Rohrbacher
Latency in the First City Toshiko Mori / Matthias Schuler
Empathy Mack Scogin
Preserving the Cultural Heritage in Tripoli, Lebanon François C. D. Vigier
The Club, NYC Wilfried Wang
INDEPENDENT DESIGN THESES
Faculty of Design
|